Eva Maria Ionescu vs Edda Mamedova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the context of recent performance over the past six months, Mamedova has secured 35.25% of points on her second serve, while Ionescu has recorded a slightly better 39.71%. These second serve stats are highly indicative of match outcomes. Furthermore, when it comes to returns, Mamedova has capitalized on 55.91% of her opponent's second serves, marginally trailing behind Ionescu, who has managed 56.01% in this regard.

Looking at first serve return performance, Mamedova leads with 40.47% success, compared to 32.01% for Ionescu. This statistic is essential to foresee who holds the advantage in this particular head-to-head matchup. Additionally, dealing with pressure situations, Mamedova has saved 47.4% of breakpoints, whereas Ionescu has demonstrated sturdiness by saving 52.03%, a vital indicator for in-game betting.

In the performance overview for the past year, Mamedova has won 65.52% of her matches (19 wins and 10 losses), contrasting with Ionescu's 56.67% success rate (17 wins and 13 losses). On the surface level, Mamedova exhibits her best career performance on hard courts, achieving a 59% win rate, while her struggles are evident with a 33% win rate on indoor hard surfaces. Conversely, Ionescu shines with a 67% win rate on hard courts and has yet to find a foothold on indoor hard courts, holding a 0% win record.

In terms of player level, Mamedova has displayed dominance in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, clinching 69.23% of her matches, while Ionescu has succeeded in 60.71% of matches in similar tournaments. This difference is critical as it emphasizes the relative strength against the competition level both players faced. Additionally, Mamedova has encountered opponents with an average rank of 369.45, in contrast to Ionescu's encounters with opponents averaging a rank of 465.5, underscoring the tougher adversaries faced by Mamedova.

Delving into match scenarios such as deciding sets provides further predictive insights. Mamedova has a 50% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, while Ionescu has excelled with a 67% win rate. It's also essential to gauge current event performances post-match commences, as players can exhibit distinct form at particular events. When it comes to break point conversion, Mamedova has been notably efficient, converting 56.25% of her opportunities, while Ionescu has converted 34.41% of her break point chances. This can provide a significant edge in tight situations.

Overall, while Mamedova and Ionescu both present strong facets, Mamedova's impressive match win percentage, tougher competition, and superior break point conversion rate position her as the likely favorite in their upcoming encounter.